Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/fc-updates
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Upcoming channel changes We're *previewing* some upcoming changes so people 1) can understand and 2) provide feedback. These changes are not launching yet. It will be a couple weeks. There will also be a bunch of communication to channel owners. After reading the entire doc, feel free to reply to with feedback or send me a DC. I've tried to answer a lot of common questions in the FAQ. https://warpcast.notion.site/Upcoming-channel-changes-1056a6c0c101800caee6ea8133f8f966
83 replies
87 recasts
309 reactions

wetsocks pfp
wetsocks
@wetsocks.eth
Why not just let the channel owner decide if they want to make it invite-only? What is the reasoning for making it default invite-only for everyone?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Channels aren't hashtags or topics. They are spaces that a specific individual gets to curate.
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Wellzy ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿ–โœž pfp
Wellzy ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿ–โœž
@wellzy
Then shouldnโ€™t they have the option to toggle off invite only?
1 reply
2 recasts
4 reactions

sartocrates pfp
sartocrates
@sartocrates
seems to me that if its about the channel owner having the power to curate how they want, toggling off โ€œinvite onlyโ€ ought to be a curatorial option. what am i missing? ๐Ÿคจ
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Wellzy ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿ–โœž pfp
Wellzy ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿ–โœž
@wellzy
Exactly. If someone creates a channel they should be able to decide how to curate it. Unilateral changes like this arenโ€™t good for existing channel owners.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

sartocrates pfp
sartocrates
@sartocrates
well, lets see how @dwr.eth would respond to this question
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction