Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Sandiforward  pfp
Sandiforward
@sandiforward
Has anyone done any sentiment or cast analysis for Farcaster clients or Warpcast specifically? I'm intrigued to know how many casts (not replies) are questions vs. statements
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Sandiforward  pfp
Sandiforward
@sandiforward
@cojo.eth perhaps with Ponder you have looked at this question also...
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Colin Johnson 💭 pfp
Colin Johnson 💭
@cojo.eth
At some point we ingested questions from three categories over the last three months. Tl;dr is questions were definitely there, but maybe 5% or less of casts
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sandiforward  pfp
Sandiforward
@sandiforward
Ah thank you this is what I was looking for and matched my assumptions. Did this data include replies or just casts?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Colin Johnson 💭 pfp
Colin Johnson 💭
@cojo.eth
Good question, just parent casts that had a question mark in them.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sandiforward  pfp
Sandiforward
@sandiforward
Okay noted. I'm fascinated by the behaviour and would think compared to X it's relatively healthy (assumption <1%) but compared to a closed Telegram group probably low (assumption 15-25%). I ask as Farcaster can differentiate by driving discussion vs. shouting at each other online, questions start discussion so feels like a good proxy for how vulnerable people are to reach out to communities in channels vs. just speak and brand.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction