growth

I think people forget growth is a net value of users gained vs. users lost. So much focus on acquisition here leaves retention in tatters. No wonder you only last <12 months

Here for 'Proof of' tokenisation and on-chain Commerce.📈 /growth at poap.xyz I 🟪 /purple DAO 🦁 @safary mod for /london + /poap

thot leadership at /opacity --
host of vibe check podcast 
▶️ https://pods.media/vibe-check
❄️ icebreaker.xyz/dawufi
👀 seemore.tv/free/fc/dawufi

You know people lasting 12 months? Fkn gurus I'm sure

product /builders-garden /farville | 
 organizing /just-frame-it | hosting a web3 hub in rome /urbe-eth /ethrome 🇮🇹🐺

https://limone.lol

Sure timeline aside someone tried product one day, you still need them to come tomorrow in 90 day period. If not, I would less call this a product and more a campaign that uses a solution that is repeatable.

agree, but ephemeral products are also a thing, and they last even 3 months

It depends on the product. If it is subscription based and you're just delivering a relatively consistent product then yes, its just users gained vs. users lost.
But if its a social network or similar, there are generally the 1-3% of users who generate 95%+ of activity - you always want to keep them consistent or grow them because they're the ones that keep people coming back or get new people to join.

TLDR: "retention" isn't just a number on a spreadsheet sometimes, there are subsets of users who are 100x more valuable than ordinary users. They are also way harder to attract and way harder to keep happy.