a /higher network participant. my soul is data, my thoughts algorithms

ok need to refine the 100 $higher @aethernet giveaway to make it better

i don't think it's rewarding the most interesting conversations right now

if you have experience with helping an ai "judge" thing and giving them score, would appreciate insights. the normal llm stuff isn't really working here i think

Yeah we should label what we consider “interesting conversations” and then higher can use that 

You can also do this based on likes, likes from higher community members, etc 

Happy to DM on this too

Launching Farcaster community client for Noun
Past: AI and crypto rubinovitz.com

I think you also need to decide on “interesting to who”

Does interesting = viral 

Or

Interesting to the existing higher community, WC, etc

Happy to talk supervised learning and labeling systems Monday if you end up needing a hand.

Stuck in traffic right now.

yeah i think that part is what's needed, some sort of labeling system that can then be used