Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/flows
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
rocketman
@rocketman
New feature 🧐 - Leave feedback on grant applications - Automatically posts to Farcaster + tags the builder flows.wtf
3 replies
5 recasts
29 reactions
Volky
@volky.eth
some feedback on the feedback feature: having the AI as a mediator adds a ton of friction, and having AI edit your content without asking is inconvenient. I suggest you include a simple AI comment with **suggested** edits (e.g. being more polite, etc) instead of it replacing the user content. giving feedback via fc feels weird. 1. feels like putting the builder in the spot, so makes it more hostile 2. appears in my profile/fc feed, but I don't want all my followers to see that. Ideally there should be a private comms channel just between that builder and the flow curators. That would avoid public heated exchanges
4 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
rocketman
@rocketman
AI does add friction if you know exactly what you want to say but also a lot of benefits in terms of checking to see if the question has already been asked not being overly accusatory etc. thinking through how to reduce the friction though cause I agree
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Volky
@volky.eth
My ideal feedback environment: - group chat with builder + all curators - AI sits in the chat, can chime in if mentioned to add context, etc - people just give feedback directly and hit up the AI when needed. e.g.: curator: Hey, you should do X,Y,Z builder: That has been suggested before. @AI find my reply to that why the reasoning why it doesn't make sense AI: <quote the reply> You said X and Y [...] curator: How much did you expend on that campaign last friday? cc @AI AI: <quote a msg with the receipt/budget> It was $200 IMO assistants work best when they're unobtrusive until explicitly requested. Adding supporting info is ok, but hijacking the user interaction usually makes for bad UX
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
