flows

New feature 🧐 

- Leave feedback on grant applications
- Automatically posts to Farcaster + tags the builder

flows.wtf

bringing the makers together 

/flows /vrbs

Artist, geek, UX/UI, gender inclusive & neurodiversity activist. ♡ ⌐◨-◨
Member of @newtroarts ✿
https://linktr.ee/presentezine

Love it! It already has some errors while retrieving some data but it's really cool!

Great feedback will adjust and get back to you cc @riderway.eth

The reason we put it on Farcaster is because we want people to see the feedback and get notified and have a good spot to discuss vs rolling our own UI which feels like non differentiating work when we have farc

I agree it’s not ideal to have it show on your profile, thinking if there’s a way to solve this hmm 

I don’t think it’s necessarily a bad thing that it’s public, we need other people to be able to see it when deciding grant effectiveness etc, but probably too public rn I agree

AI does add friction if you know exactly what you want to say but also a lot of benefits in terms of checking to see if the question has already been asked not being overly accusatory etc. thinking through how to reduce the friction though cause I agree

@gt @dwr.eth @v any reason a reply to external content shows on your profile page? seems an antipattern vs. the way normal replies work

some feedback on the feedback feature:

having the AI as a mediator adds a ton of friction, and having AI edit your content without asking is inconvenient. I suggest you include a simple AI comment with **suggested** edits (e.g. being more polite, etc) instead of it replacing the user content.

giving feedback via fc feels weird.
 1. feels like putting the builder in the spot, so makes it more hostile
 2. appears in my profile/fc feed, but I don't want all my followers to see that.

Ideally there should be a private comms channel just between that builder and the flow curators. That would avoid public heated exchanges