![Rnnznn.base.eth pfp](https://imagedelivery.net/BXluQx4ige9GuW0Ia56BHw/eef32959-537c-41f2-ba82-8d654d917c00/original)
Rnnznn.base.eth
@rnn
354 Following
233 Followers
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
One meta belief I have, is that I think "on the face pursuing idealistic objective A, but actually being tilted toward selfish objective B" is better than "openly pursuing objective B".
Many seem to believe the opposite, typically saying something like "at least the latter is honest".
I feel like what this misses, is that maintaining the face of pursuing idealistic objective A, and using A to coordinate a large coalition, is a pretty big speed bump against attempts to pursue B too brazenly. When "the mask comes off", things actually become much worse, and strategies that pursue B at high costs to other values (including A, and also often general human decency) become unlocked.
Are there any good arguments against this intuition I have? (Whether generalized, or about specific situations) 49 replies
142 recasts
746 reactions
0 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
10 replies
92 recasts
322 reactions
10 replies
8 recasts
79 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
17 replies
251 recasts
731 reactions
8 replies
2 recasts
17 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
45 replies
132 recasts
539 reactions
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
13 replies
24 recasts
151 reactions
91 replies
65 recasts
360 reactions
36 replies
146 recasts
707 reactions
21 replies
71 recasts
306 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
32 replies
134 recasts
595 reactions
1 reply
4 recasts
21 reactions