creating and destroying; built flying cars & autonomous vehicles, now building /faust, more here: /july, web: july.rocks

What's a hypothesis we could test for, that would be true if your model of AI researchers is correct, and false if their p(doom) values actually are well-considered?

eg. one that comes to mind is: in your model, an individual researcher's stated p(doom) should be very volatile week by week. Is that true in practice?

/me reading Vitalik's cast, which I understand and agree with, then comparing the quality to my latest "Where's Hammy" cast. I think I need to work on my cast quality.

Husband, dad, dev • @dune.eth wizard • Ultimate Ⓜ️oxie Dashboard https://tinyurl.com/moxiedash •  I'm just zis guy, you know?

ai16z degen, buidler, and shitcaster 🫡 (acc/ai16z)

My liege got tagged as spam 😭😭😭 rip vitalik fans

Tbf most thoughts come across as low effort compared to Vitalik’s casts 💀

😂🤣 Nah I think more people understand Hammy than Vitalink

Do you think a comedian looks at a politician and thinks “I need to be more like them”. This is the beauty of Farcaster and channels. We post what is appropriate to the channel and don’t have to pidgeon hole ourselves into a category. On Twitter I have 4 accounts which all cover different topics. This is not required here. We just need to give users the ability to mute specific channels.

I never understand anything he tweets 🙂‍↔️

FID 4567 🔫🎩💫 DEGEN-X @rjs
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
79 $degen