Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/higher
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ripe↑ pfp
ripe↑
@ripe
now feels like a good time to run another @rounds to distribute $higher from the party treasury wdyt?
5 replies
0 recast
28 reactions

tyler ↑ pfp
tyler ↑
@trh
Not saying we shouldn’t, but I’m not sure anything in the current climate incentivizes anything but selling.
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

ripe↑ pfp
ripe↑
@ripe
do you think that changes if the people receiving tokens have “earned” them via participation?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

tyler ↑ pfp
tyler ↑
@trh
I think that’s a good way to go about it and rewarding participation especially at the lows is a good approach. I don’t know how it changes price structure or incentives, though. That said, if a distribution will improve the higher surface area and positioning long-term, then it might be worth it as @clfx.eth says. Price action and engagement are two different outcomes. Sometimes the same strategy applies to both; when they conflict, you have to decide where the commitment and principle lies.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions