Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Brutally honest and sobering feedback from r/ethereum on Farcaster. We have a lot of work to do! https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/192zi9a/why_are_you_here_and_not_on_farcaster/
43 replies
13 recasts
181 reactions
elle
@riotgoools
there are a lot of misconceptions/wrong assumptions about fc in there – which i guess is not surprising since a very small % of ppl actually read docs. but also probably means there needs to be much more simplified way of conveying reasons why ppl would want to use this if u want to capture more than the docs-readers
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
eric siu 🐈
@randomishwalk
gpt-chatbot-docs (docs + GH, tweak the temp on it too + preloaded prompting for accuracy) (or use claude-2 or llama-13b or the latest microsoft small model phi to save money) run RAG over docs + GH
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
elle
@riotgoools
this would mean the ppl who don't care to read the docs would need to care enough to run them thru gpt – which they probably won't (⌒_⌒;) ideally the messaging should be simple/clear enough that most won't need to worry about the docs at all but still have correct info
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
eric siu 🐈
@randomishwalk
agree! just thought *maybe* some type of constrained LLM chatbot would help with the transition in meantime but they are finicky and that is a very fair pt you make!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
