There's not going to be a civil war; not today and not anytime soon. America is a fluid economic and cultural zone without dividing lines that could organize political violence. If you look at data, the most significant form of polarization politically is based on intimate individualistic factors like gender and age. Most importantly, no country with a high per-capita GDP has ever had a civil war. 

The logic is simple: Even if you're really mad about something in politics, in America you still have the option of watching the football game and going to Cinnabon. The minimal bread of Cinnabon and circus of the NFL is democratically accessible to the masses on a level unlike anything in human history. To the vast majority of people that rationally sounds like a better option than rotting away in prison or giving up ones life or health for some abstract cause.

Rich countries don't have civil wars, they just yell alot. Maybe a civil war could be organized in the metaverse one day so people can blow off steam.

Huxley’s vision was of a populace subdued by its addiction to soma, the pharmacological metaphor for circenses (Roman circus / modern-day entertainment).

Orwell’s vision was of a populace tamed by ubiquitous surveillance (the panopticon) and state violence.

I wonder if the developed world is observing a convergence of both.

Digital technology is, in an ironic etymological twist, providing endless entertainment at our fingertips. Its perverse effects to mental health, especially in future citizens (kids, teenagers), are now well documented.

Separately, Snowden et al. have paid a heavy price to reveal that the panopticon is a reality, and the ratchet effect means there is no going back.

We’re missing the state violence element, but we witness the signs of a violent polarization of the political identities, even if (I agree with @mazmhussain) I don’t expect the type of civil conflict that Twitter pundits seem to fantasize about. And entertainment itself is laced with that same violent substance

Writer, podcaster, and commentator on foreign affairs and politics. Runs /dropglobalnews

Please support: https://www.dropsitenews.com/

there's also another part from orwell which is now reality – the ministry of truth, ie. misinformation, fake news, alternative facts, etc. i guess another type of soma, in a way. in adam curtis' documentary, hypernormalisation, he talks about these tactics, as used by russia, to keep the populace in a state of constant confusion and therefore controlled

i like internet (◕‿◕)♡ riotgoools.com | veryinter.net/person | nf.td/elle | alt: @elle | very internet person channel: /vip

Freedom Education - https://peripatos.network

i think adam curtis would also say that media and ppl with power (politicians, ceos, oligarchs, etc) also work together in a good cop/bad cop kind of way towards a shared goal of destabilizing reality to keep the masses on the back foot

Absolutely. Legacy media constantly misrepresents the power they wield as opposed to the CEOs and founders the condemn. 

They also insist that “dangerous” information be censored. A democracy is not something to be proud of if its participants are not thriving with the freedom of expression. Hitler was elected after all. 

A state sponsored media and academia and a crackdown on all else cannot exist for a democracy to thrive. That my friend is what they call a theocracy.

co-founder @chaindrop § software engineer § privacy wonk § music head § theoretical memeticist

all of his books sound really interesting. i'll have to check them out thx!

For a book on Russia (and other countries) tactics along these lines, I highly recommend "This is Not Propaganda" by Peter Pomerantsev. Really fascinating look at how information is controlled, shaped and directed in the modern age.