Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Catabolismo
@catabolismo
I don't find this aesthetically pleasing. The faces in particular have that soulless model pose that MJ makes. But you can't say this person isn't a "creator". Whatever that means, he evidently put lots of time and resources into making a homage to his favorite director. For me this is enough to consider it art, regardless of the tool he made it with. https://x.com/PJaccetturo/status/1841884941724065984?t=4uE1LuVIpoRh7MPL5_CfDA&s=19
4 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
elle
@riotgoools
cue hayao miyazaki clip of him destroying some tech guy's soul (๑>ᴗ<๑) it's definitely "content." and that makes the guy a content creator ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ not sure about art. i don't know how useful the art term is anymore in the age of content. and art is different for everyone anyways i think this still has a long way to go tho. to me this just takes all the life out of the original and makes it look generic and bland in the way that mj/ai works by producing an average of training data. but idk, that might appeal to some ppl. it feels soulless, as u said, and i guess art without soul is just content
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Catabolismo
@catabolismo
"and I guess art without soul is just content" -> loved that lol I mostly think as you said it's meaningless to debate what is art in the age of content. Let's just make the concept as broad as possible and talk about content and creativity. I do think this guy put his soul on this, and his knowledge of the tools gave him this. Some people with the right background might make more "artsy" content with the same tools.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction