Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Follow up: what would a token-gated experience solve for you on Farcaster *today*?
40 replies
3 recasts
41 reactions

Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
monetization outside the walls of warpcast
2 replies
0 recast
13 reactions

Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
communities are defined by boundaries: who can enter and who canโ€™t channels are currently like hashtags: anyone can enter. gating would make them more like real communities this would give hosts more autonomy, agency, and a feeling of true ownership every host a founder
4 replies
0 recast
17 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
i agree the end state should be this, but the Q i ask myself is why is *now* the right time to launch that? imo, FC has provided value to many sides with its accessibility and its openness. itโ€™s magical. what are the pros/cons of /nouns not being token-gated? if not many cons, is now the time to intro exclusivity?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
exclusivity is precisely what made farcaster such an amazing place prior to permissionless. why? because of the romerogorithm. in order for fc to scale each channel host needs to become a dan. that wonโ€™t happen unless they have authentic ownership and real financial upside
2 replies
1 recast
6 reactions

rileybeans pfp
rileybeans
@rileybeans
yeah but what happens to the people who enter before token-gated exclusivity is enabled. they get kicked out?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

๐š๐”ช๐Ÿพ๐šก๐šก๐Ÿพ pfp
๐š๐”ช๐Ÿพ๐šก๐šก๐Ÿพ
@gm8xx8
drop them token. reward the early followers.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction