DAO tooling is such a nerd snipe
CT nerds can sense the potential for it, it's fun to design and build, no one (yet) seems to have substantive willingness to pay for it.

This will change.

@teamSobol
DAOin’ w/ @dimoDAO, @hatsprotocol
Alum: @banklesssDAO, CityDAO, PolygonDAO

I'm seeing some pretty substantive inflows for DAO tooling in smaller niche areas. 

I think the problem is most devs building tooling want to throw some contracts up and think ppl will just figure out how to use them.

Devs that are funded and building for a specific use case and onboarding the users directly are shipping more useful tools.

Decentralizing infrastructure with Kleomedes |

Building collaboration with Nearchos |

/octant Community Grants Council |

/colinks-and-co CoDAO Council

Please say this louder.

Devs seem to trivialize the internal work neccesary for onchain orgs (esp social orgs) to adopt web3 tools.

Tools like Hats Protocol are great, but seem to neglect the reality that most orgs aren't able to easily rolecraft as needed or sensemake around org structures/relationships

web3 citizen and Open Source Software enjoyer

It is surprisingly hard to do the internal work!

Spot on about hats, I have an org I would love to use hats with, but they aren't ready yet to do that work. 

I will say, however, another org I'm working with that IS ready to do that work has simply hired the Hats team to join us for the process!