This also means that if you are targeting engagement with high SCS users, there are only a few hundred people that actually matter. It's the ones you probably already know about. Of course it depends on how these scores are used in other apps, but the skew is real.

Moxie doesn't reward content based on quality

It simply provides a few hundred accounts disproportionate power to distribute the token based on the accounts with which they engage https://warpcast.com/0xt0ny/0x60e6fee3

Sometimes that power happens to reward (objectively) quality content (e.g. @mazmhussain)

But to say Moxie's design rewards the highest quality content simply isn't accurate

Writer, podcaster, and commentator on foreign affairs and politics. Runs /dropglobalnews

Please support: https://www.dropsitenews.com/

i see what you did there

and this is good! you got me and others to engage in a substantive conversation

I like running, poker and oysters | Founder, Social Forensics (SocialForensics.com) | Berkeley & UPenn | Learning to listen

Working on Moxie at Airstack| airstack.xyz | moxie.xyz | hihi! 


A cast about Moxie distro being under the influence of a few people gets discussed (and rewarded with Moxie) by the same few people. 

We need to go deeper...

Crypto enthusiast, ethics, movies and photography.

Founder of /gentlemanswagers

I break prod. | nkem.dev /learninpublic /true

Diss Moxie, get rewarded because people will come for you. Say something nice about Moxie, risk not being seen because everyone loves Moxie. 📝