daos

Currently, we’re on the path of protocolizing digital governance. Yet it seems to be converging on esoteric jargon and functions, is there a path out? Is there something else that won’t lead us to localized ossification with niche standards, procedures, and a working class of governance technical support?

Governance Public Utilities for @zksync at @thezknation

Its fine IMO, In time best practices will come out in the wash. 

Over simplification, is just dumbing things down which would lead to a dominate two-party system we see IRL which defeats the whole point of governance innovation.

Ultimate goal here is to show people they can have an effect on outcomes.

(🏗️, https://lighthouse.cx)
 (🎥,  /cinema-stills) , (⬛, /textures), (🌊, /emergence)


I’m mostly concerned that privileged jargon will lead to less innovation overall. Language could be used as a gate

I just don’t know if any UI can save us — because we tend to abstract underlying mechanics until the only way to interact with the machine is by a million-page instruction booklet — this is @vgr post that inspired this thread: https://open.substack.com/pub/ribbonfarmstudio/p/where-are-the-elites

Perhaps, however I think that could mostly be solved though good interface design that abstracts the underlying complexity away.