Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

rafa pfp
rafa
@rafa
Currently, weโ€™re on the path of protocolizing digital governance. Yet it seems to be converging on esoteric jargon and functions, is there a path out? Is there something else that wonโ€™t lead us to localized ossification with niche standards, procedures, and a working class of governance technical support?
5 replies
2 recasts
78 reactions

1๐ด35๐ธ1 pfp
1๐ด35๐ธ1
@1a35e1
Its fine IMO, In time best practices will come out in the wash. Over simplification, is just dumbing things down which would lead to a dominate two-party system we see IRL which defeats the whole point of governance innovation. Ultimate goal here is to show people they can have an effect on outcomes.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

rafa pfp
rafa
@rafa
Iโ€™m mostly concerned that privileged jargon will lead to less innovation overall. Language could be used as a gate
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions