Quintus pfp

Quintus

@quintus

56 Following
149 Followers


Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
Cheslin’s got that dawg in him
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
Just published a piece with Christoph which frames all of the research going into “propsing rights allocation” (i.e. ePBS, APS, ET etc) There are a bunch of designs, posts and papers but its not always clear how it all relates to each other. We try to clarify that Some opinions and open questions also included https://collective.flashbots.net/t/isolating-attesters-from-mev/3837?u=quintus
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions

Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
wen focil
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
The recent bok victories are so much more satisfying when you take into account the new players and strategies we’re trialing
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
All blacks irl are smaller than I expected Tbf they do have to run a lot
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
https://warpcast.com/quintus/0x38a95b31
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
Nice new post from Christoph Schlegel at Flashbots tl;dr: APS designs with an inelastic supply of "proposing rights" lead to more market concentration than elastic supply I.e. having a fixed number of exec tickets likely leads-to-winner-takes-all unlike systems that resemble PoS in which people can stake as much as they like This is one of a number of recent pieces that have been narrowing down the design space for Ethereum’s proposing rights allocation (APS, ePBS etc) https://collective.flashbots.net/t/inelastic-vs-elastic-supply-why-proof-of-stake-could-be-less-centralizing-than-execution-tickets/3816?u=quintus
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
In case anyone's missed it, here's intel's response to the recent claimed vuln tl;dr: Seems theres a bunch of reasons not to worry about this specific "vuln" Ofc the broader point that TEE-based systems should be designed in anticipation of failures is still valid https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/announcement/intel-security-announcement-2024-08-29-001.html
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
Great article to learn how TEEs (don’t) really work and some fixes https://collective.flashbots.net/t/closing-the-intel-tdx-page-fault-side-channel-or-the-case-for-tdexit-notify/3775
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
I guess the great thing about farcaster is that I can shitpost and feel like Im contributing to a greater cause
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
Can’t tell if “wallet” is a terrible name for the software users use to control their keys because its so much more than moving and custodying funds Or if its a great name because it frames more of our identity snd the information we put out into the world as valuable
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
If your boss offered you a promotion in exchange for sexual favours would that be bad practice because he has your career branching on secret bits? (This is a joke to clear)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
Calling HR - everyone in this office is talking about their secret bits
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
Beware the focus ion beam
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
No one loves acronyms more than Intel
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
What are the important differences between execution tickets and have a new class of stakers who get paid only for proposing blocks? Both see people depositing capital and then random selection weighted by deposit Is the primary diff is that tickets are tradeable?
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
Alignment has been achieved internally
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
Been thinking about things in this direction with execution ticket conversations heating up https://m.youtube.com/watch?si=ECRd8DCMOC9Ewzn5&v=XYg_0rt9pv8&feature=youtu.be
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
Maybe I missed the discussion on this but it feels like one underrated benefit of ET is that you’re probably reducing the number of individual parties that can cause a liveness fault (from proposer & bb to only bb) (Those who believe ET will still be filled by sth like the PBS market on Ethereum will disagree)
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
Thank god for version arrays
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction