Quintus pfp

Quintus

@quintus

42 Following
112 Followers
Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
Beware the focus ion beam
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
No one loves acronyms more than Intel
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
Wait am I busy launching a memecoin?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
What do you think the challenges for multi-EVM-thread interop are?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
What are the important differences between execution tickets and have a new class of stakers who get paid only for proposing blocks? Both see people depositing capital and then random selection weighted by deposit Is the primary diff is that tickets are tradeable?
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
Alignment has been achieved internally
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
Been thinking about things in this direction with execution ticket conversations heating up https://m.youtube.com/watch?si=ECRd8DCMOC9Ewzn5&v=XYg_0rt9pv8&feature=youtu.be
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
I doubt PBS as we see it today would be a stable equilibrium Agree on the last point I have thoughts but seems better to write a longer form doc on this at some point
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dmarz pfp
Dmarz
@dmarz
Cryptography people: how insane would it be to implement ECDSA signing, specifically secp256k1, in solidity?
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
To put it differently: why would we recreate a market with multiple single points of failure
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
Then, if they outsource, i’d say the same is true for the agent outsourced to
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
Yes I meant missing payload thinking is that the ticket holder will most likely not end up in a market structure in which they completely delegate block building rights but are also required in the “critical path” to building a block Either they completely outsource or they are able to push it through alone
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
Maybe I missed the discussion on this but it feels like one underrated benefit of ET is that you’re probably reducing the number of individual parties that can cause a liveness fault (from proposer & bb to only bb) (Those who believe ET will still be filled by sth like the PBS market on Ethereum will disagree)
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
Thank god for version arrays
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
how ableist ❌
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
Ok that makes sense Was asking while thinking along the lines of the endgame. How much can we really push to a small number of highly resourced nodes? Do we get to a point where beacon block throughput holds back decentralisation because beacon leaders are sampled from validators (small nodes) instead of builders?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
And the problem with moving all of this to the block coming from an exec ticket holder is that we don’t have CR/liveness guarantees from the exec ticket holders right?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
In the exec tickets design, do beacon blocks play any roles other than: * propagating attestations * inclusion lists Would it be feasible to completely leave them out? (hypothetical just to understand consensus implications) Cc: @mikeneuder.eth @fradamt
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
Shill me you execution tickets takes I’m compiling something
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Quintus pfp
Quintus
@quintus
Latter as a noun, former as an adjective “mehvum execution”
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction