Last night, I deactivated my own Twitter account and walked away from an audience of 30,000 followers. 

Because I no longer believe a moral argument can be made for staying on Twitter/X in 2023.

Last night, I deactivated my own Twitter account and walked away from an audience of 30,000 followers. 

Because I no longer believe a moral argument can be made for staying on Twitter/X in 2023.

https://joanwestenberg.medium.com/there-is-no-moral-argument-for-staying-on-twitter-x-cdef14b04730

I write about tech + humans + philosophy. Farcaster OG. FID 3305 founder of /theindex 

https://www.joanwestenberg.com/

That's commendable. 

But I don't think he has to be a perfect example of what he advocates for either. Regarding hate speech, my view has been that hate speech = free speech. 
Incitement to violence is the only that needs to be banned.

Followed on medium 🔉

The only problem is externality pricing.

Building https://negationgame.com

Interesting conundrum. I'm going to meditate on the answer for a while, but I think the answer to that would be somewhere in challenging the premise

ok but let's say that there was a type of word you could say that caused people's nose to bleed, and it just so happened to affect people such that if their nose *didn't* bleed they would really itch to say the word.

If you ran a social platform, would you take any efforts to mitigate the virality of that word?