Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
two things can be true: 1. this is good revenue generation for these pods that wouldn’t have been generated on traditional platforms 2. as a podcaster, “minutes listened” is infinitely more valuable to me compared to “mints,” which imo is the most unreliable onchain metric for quality of multimedia content
21 replies
13 recasts
126 reactions
proxy
@proxystudio.eth
you could take "minutes listened" vs mints a step further for onchain media to proliferate, pods might repackage longer episodes into smaller, more shareable segments feel like "influence on discourse" is another really important, more ambiguous metric. I'll always remember the early "many such cases" episodes where you and jonny were talking about stuff that got me thinking, and often prompted responses. with social data we can probably surface some of this "relative influence"
3 replies
1 recast
9 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
yes!!! this is why i'm so bullish on decentralized social. where else is that data open and accessible??? you're not going to get that from twitter i don't want to speak for @nonlinear.eth, but someone tagging us in their reflections on a podcast actually means way more to me than them minting
2 replies
1 recast
10 reactions
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
trying to do better with this -- we need to be dropping more clips here for this reason
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Gramajo👽
@gramajo.eth
This is why I end all my podcast episodes with a castoff, where I ask ppl a question related to what they just listened and they answer back to me however they want but preferably out in the open.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
