Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
two things can be true: 1. this is good revenue generation for these pods that wouldn’t have been generated on traditional platforms 2. as a podcaster, “minutes listened” is infinitely more valuable to me compared to “mints,” which imo is the most unreliable onchain metric for quality of multimedia content
21 replies
13 recasts
126 reactions

proxy pfp
proxy
@proxystudio.eth
you could take "minutes listened" vs mints a step further for onchain media to proliferate, pods might repackage longer episodes into smaller, more shareable segments feel like "influence on discourse" is another really important, more ambiguous metric. I'll always remember the early "many such cases" episodes where you and jonny were talking about stuff that got me thinking, and often prompted responses. with social data we can probably surface some of this "relative influence"
3 replies
1 recast
9 reactions

Gramajođź‘˝ pfp
Gramajođź‘˝
@gramajo.eth
This is why I end all my podcast episodes with a castoff, where I ask ppl a question related to what they just listened and they answer back to me however they want but preferably out in the open.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

yoraco pfp
yoraco
@yoraco
This is a great idea, will implement it on our podcasts as well!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction