we did not learn our lesson from aethernet x clanker, so despite strict limits on our end for # of tokens created by an account, people are rushing to try to replicate $anon  

in general i think its time for more clear boundaries around tickers, accounts, repetition. balancing access and limitations will be extremely important. 

clanker will be taken offline ~8am est for some updates

founder /openventures | /proxyswap | tokenbot @clanker

"d/acc"
An ex-banker fell into ethereum rabbithole.
Economics was love until I met web3.

  /f /kp /fbi

more general issue here is that super anon is not a single users account. its used by many, and technically its also a project's product. one we love and want to align with not cause any hassle for

Yeah. Same name tickers should be prohibited.

a lot, but I'm less concered with the duplicate ticker issue - happens everywhere, very common and easier to fix in this context - and more concerned with the ambiguities of this situation

sad reality: lot of attention and money aimed at our corner right now, in crypto this means scammers, impersonation

good, what will be done to stop this from happening? 

Good. Man I don’t think I’ve ever been this bullish on something. Send it.

I’ve seen a few different $paradox tokens as well

26 $hunt