Protector

@protector

106 Following

67 Followers

Protector pfp

'This DAO is dark and can't be seen onchain'

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Protector pfp

All organizations can be seen as an agent network, like a two-part model. Governance in crypto is more like a mix of the fourth and second types. It starts like the fourth type. Holders give goals, then delegates try to handle everything. It's like guessing what an elephant looks like by touch. They start making plans without clear instructions, which is challenging. Then it shifts to the second type for getting things done. Delegates figure out what's going on and make plans. Agents do the actual work. Regular company management is similar. It has two splits, creating three roles: Shareholders: set goals Managers: environmental awareness, planning Employees: action https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jpGHShgevmmTqXHy5/decomposing-agency-capabilities-without-desires

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Ξ2T 🍖 pfp

Updated Zodiac Wiki resource for DAOs by the Gnosis Guild community https://www.zodiac.wiki/

0 reply

1 recast

3 reactions

Protector pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Graham Novak pfp

Organizational debt is even harder to solve than technical debt

0 reply

1 recast

3 reactions

Protector pfp

Why & How it will change?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Protector pfp

Any concrete examples of objective rules that smart contracts can implement to guide subjective human engagement in DAOs? For instance, could these include voting mechanisms with specific thresholds, time-locked decisions, or reputation systems that influence voting power based on past contributions?

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Protector pfp

Most of these are just pipe dreams. It's all too common for crypto enthusiasts to throw around buzzwords like 'DAO' or 'token launch' without any real substance or follow-through. In reality, the vast majority of these ideas are destined to fizzle out, with tokens eventually becoming worthless. It's just empty hype masquerading as innovation.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Protector pfp

https://warpcast.com/seneca/0x83357301 The calcification of the network of deception and mistrust within bureaucratic structures. The mechanism of verity depletion generally unfolds in the following manner: 1. The majority abstain from veracity (to safeguard their effective influence within the community), adopting strategies of mendacity, while anticipating candor from others. 2. Upon encountering truthful discourse from others, individuals, driven by self-preservation instincts, promptly engage in criticism or denunciation. 3. Potential truth-tellers, observing these dynamics, instinctively resort to reticence. 4. Ultimately, the community is populated by a substantial cohort who, while abstaining from truthfulness themselves, harbor expectations for others to articulate veracities.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Protector pfp

The Cyclical Evolution of Pop-up Cities: A Three-Phase Model

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Protector pfp

Protector Governance Notes: Bureaucratization & Distributive Justice in crypto

2 replies

0 recast

1 reaction

Protector pfp

Pretend to be a memecoin but the core is actually Coordinape. Maybe we can call it mutual memecoin?

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

two3oh2 🎩 pfp

still think the endgame for crypto is in governance. right now it doesn’t really make sense because the industry needs to stretch its wings and fly, but eventually the way we want to organize the landscape will be useful and it’s not something that’s inherently evil.

4 replies

1 recast

7 reactions

Trent pfp

A few weeks ago I published "Capital and enclosure in software commons: Linux & Ethereum" - intros to Common, commons - commons enclosure/capture - how the Linux + Ethereum commons are structured - how capital engages w/ these commons https://trent.mirror.xyz/GDDRqetgglGR5IYK1uTXxLalwIH6pBF9nulmY9zarUw

2 replies

3 recasts

22 reactions