Protector

@protector

109 Following

78 Followers

Protector pfp

https://paragraph.xyz/@protector/what-constitutes-strong-social-scalability

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Protector pfp

How should prediction market systems be designed? MetaDAO presents a conservative new approach, outsourcing information accuracy to analysts and delegating information innovation and costs to agents. https://blog.metadao.fi/a-futards-guide-to-the-meta-dao-7a6b8d66443a

3 replies

0 recast

1 reaction

Protector pfp

Pan Chao's 2019 sharing on MakerDAO governance, '4 Common Misconceptions About DeFi Governance', is quite interesting. He argued that decentralized risk management must ensure that rigorous, fact-based theories take precedence over individual opinions or group biases. https://www.mytokencap.com/zh/news/118537.html

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Protector pfp

The Legitimacy Crisis Under Major Infrastructure Development How should we understand Ethereum's - or rather Vitalik's - inherent contradiction? The entire Devcon presented Ethereum's roadmap as a massive infrastructure project - focusing on scaling, censorship resistance, and ZK. This declares the next decade as an era of infrastructure building - characterized by high investment but low immediate returns. Infrastructure is expensive, forcing Vitalik to become a leader, constantly raising funds and recruiting. However, large infrastructure projects struggle to self-validate their value or demonstrate clear future impact. This infrastructure development seems to suppress certain possibilities, making it difficult to convince the market to trust Vitalik, thus creating a legitimacy crisis.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Protector pfp

Throughout Devcon, there was no mention of governance issues at all, except for the distant prospect of prediction markets :)

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Protector pfp

https://paragraph.xyz/@protector/why-cooperative-style-social-innovation-is-mid

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Protector pfp

'This DAO is dark and can't be seen onchain'

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Protector pfp

All organizations can be seen as an agent network, like a two-part model. Governance in crypto is more like a mix of the fourth and second types. It starts like the fourth type. Holders give goals, then delegates try to handle everything. It's like guessing what an elephant looks like by touch. They start making plans without clear instructions, which is challenging. Then it shifts to the second type for getting things done. Delegates figure out what's going on and make plans. Agents do the actual work. Regular company management is similar. It has two splits, creating three roles: Shareholders: set goals Managers: environmental awareness, planning Employees: action https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jpGHShgevmmTqXHy5/decomposing-agency-capabilities-without-desires

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Protector pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Protector pfp

Any concrete examples of objective rules that smart contracts can implement to guide subjective human engagement in DAOs? For instance, could these include voting mechanisms with specific thresholds, time-locked decisions, or reputation systems that influence voting power based on past contributions?

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Protector pfp

Most of these are just pipe dreams. It's all too common for crypto enthusiasts to throw around buzzwords like 'DAO' or 'token launch' without any real substance or follow-through. In reality, the vast majority of these ideas are destined to fizzle out, with tokens eventually becoming worthless. It's just empty hype masquerading as innovation.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Protector pfp

The Cyclical Evolution of Pop-up Cities: A Three-Phase Model

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Protector pfp

Protector Governance Notes: Bureaucratization & Distributive Justice in crypto

3 replies

0 recast

0 reaction

Protector pfp

Pretend to be a memecoin but the core is actually Coordinape. Maybe we can call it mutual memecoin?

0 reply

0 recast

3 reactions