Theoretically, there's a perfect crypto governance - no governance at all

In reality, though, there's a spectrum, and different governance system and approaches will be appropriate for different communities

Theoretically, there's a perfect crypto governance - no governance at all

In reality, though, there's a spectrum, and different governance system and approaches will be appropriate for different communities

https://polynya.mirror.xyz/VAmUYGENEVgVCrmbSjhHQvM0P5wxS84lpAn8ye4dfFY

Highly curated news & content for web3 builders. New link every 4 hours. All links handpicked by the Kiwi community.

https://kiwinews.xyz/

Specifically? Not really, though I write about it on Optimism governance forums:

Building @kiwi 
Writing @ https://kanfa.macbudkowski.com/

Specifically? Not really, though I write about it on Optimism governance forums: https://gov.optimism.io/u/polynya/summary

Interesting take, submitted to @kiwi :)

BTW have you written any longer piece about OP governance?

Blockchain and Digital Assets advisory. Building across Asia. Let's chat!

That's a pretty random choice for a take over...

Can you please take over Justin Bons account and just replace him completely 🥲

The degen part of @liquityprotocol • Views my own • DM’s open

Liquity is a great example of a project that needed *some* governance on the spectrum, but they went and as a result the protocol is suffering from endemic flaws with no ways of fixing them. I'll suggest, though, that the LQTY tokenholders should launch a Liquity V2 with better mechanics, similar to Uniswap.

Liquity is well known for having no governance, and being immutable.

I also believe in zero governance and immutable protocols, but I'm happy that we have the full spectrum. Diversity.