Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
kripcat.eth 🎩
@kripcat.eth
Calling @polymutex.eth This cast reminded me of your story from a couple days back. I’m no fan of Musk and this screenshot seems believable based on verifiable past behaviour from Musk, so there is a threat of confirmation bias here. It could be a fake account or a fake image entirely. Short of me trawling through Twitter myself to confirm something which is pretty immaterial to my life. How could the original caster use EAS or ZK Proofs to provide verification that this image is genuine when casting? If it’s not possible today, what are the roadblocks?
3 replies
0 recast
29 reactions
Snibb123.eth
@snibb123
My understanding is that while a blockchain can store a hash proving which AI generated an image, there would need to be unified agreement among all AI companies to pair each generated image with such a hash, and so far there isn’t. Also, if you took a picture of that image, the hash would be gone. Etc etc.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
A pure hash match would indeed be trivial to defeat. But check this thread for how this can still be done. https://warpcast.com/polymutex.eth/0x1401393b
3 replies
1 recast
1 reaction
Snibb123.eth
@snibb123
I’m trying to extrapolate this from a talk I heard on why proving real images online with blockchain is not a solution, since it would require all cameras to have the same verification system, and CP2A (our closes attempt so far) doesn’t need a blockchain. So I could be inaccurately porting over certain concepts.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Snibb123.eth
@snibb123
Seems like there’s a lot of pieces that are still somewhat theoretical?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
