Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
kripcat.eth 🎩
@kripcat.eth
Calling @polymutex.eth This cast reminded me of your story from a couple days back. I’m no fan of Musk and this screenshot seems believable based on verifiable past behaviour from Musk, so there is a threat of confirmation bias here. It could be a fake account or a fake image entirely. Short of me trawling through Twitter myself to confirm something which is pretty immaterial to my life. How could the original caster use EAS or ZK Proofs to provide verification that this image is genuine when casting? If it’s not possible today, what are the roadblocks?
3 replies
0 recast
29 reactions
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
All the pieces to make this work exist and work in theory, but no one has hooked them up all together to make this a reality in practice. You need: 1: A way to retrieve tweet data from X 2: A way to post them onchain in a way that everyone can tell they came from X 3: A way to prove that they match a screenshot ⤵️
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
HH
@hamud
It's genuinely easier if the user would post a screenshot and a link to the source. Which is what people generally do anyway on that platform
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Snibb123.eth
@snibb123
My understanding is that while a blockchain can store a hash proving which AI generated an image, there would need to be unified agreement among all AI companies to pair each generated image with such a hash, and so far there isn’t. Also, if you took a picture of that image, the hash would be gone. Etc etc.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
