walletbeat

Fleek

Like app frontends, Walletbeat ought to walk the talk of decentralization and censorship resistance.

Will move from Vertex to IPFS + ENS.
Perhaps an ERC-6860 version down the line too?

Work-in-progress version:
https://dev.walletbeat.eth.limo/beta/

So /fleek is ending the free hosting tier.
Walletbeat should move to a new IPFS host.
Requirements:
- ENS support
- Accepts crypto without KYC
- Integrates with GitHub CI without giving GitHub the keys to rug the domain
Bonus:
- DNSLink
- Service worker verifying IPFS CIDs

So /fleek is ending the free hosting tier.
Walletbeat should move to a new IPFS host.
Requirements:
- ENS support
- Accepts crypto without KYC
- Integrates with GitHub CI without giving GitHub the keys to rug the domain
Bonus:
- DNSLink
- Service worker verifying IPFS CIDs
https://warpcast.com/polymutex.eth/0x64dfcaad

Contributor @ /walletbeat.

Censorship resistance requires privacy.

In the running:

1. Fleek's non-free tier. They promise they will have crypto payments available before shutting down the free tier. It remains to be seen whether they will require KYC on that.

Staying with Fleek is probably the laziest option, but doesn't meet any of the bonus requirements.

working on decentralized frontend hosting at @earthfast

2. @earthfast.
Looks great! Probably the only option that pioneered the approach of using a service worker to verify CID hashes.
Cons:
- Pricing model still unclear
- Earthfast homepage doesn't load at all in my Firefox browser (the service worker violates CSP for some reason)

Decentralize your frontend, securely.
https://earthfast.com/

Orbiter

Fleek is moving to free trials and eliminating the free plan. If you’re hosting a website on IPFS through Fleek, you can move to Orbiter for free.

3. /orbiter

Would prefer to be able to log in with a Safe wallet or similar, but OK fine.
Unclear if it does DNSLink or browser-side CID verification.

Other than that, looks like a great option.
And per the below cast, there may be a path to a free plan from Fleek:

3. /orbiter

Would prefer to be able to log in with a Safe wallet or similar, but OK fine.
Unclear if it does DNSLink or browser-side CID verification.

Other than that, looks like a great option.
And per the below cast, there may be a path to a free plan from Fleek:
https://warpcast.com/polluterofminds/0xad44d6c5

you might want to use Blumen

you could replicate the IPFS deployment on multiple services and use Safe to manage the website

https://blumen.stauro.dev/

4. Blumen

The more DIY of the approaches listed here, which I like.
Biggest drawback is requiring gas payments on push, so must keep hot wallet keys with access to the ENS domain in GitHub CI, which is unfortunate.
Client-side CID verification would also have to be DIY

4. Blumen

The more DIY of the approaches listed here, which I like.
Biggest drawback is requiring gas payments on push, so must keep hot wallet keys with access to the ENS domain in GitHub CI, which is unfortunate.
Client-side CID verification would also have to be DIY

https://warpcast.com/v1rtl.eth/0x9818b5fc

What I'd love to see: A static, never-changing minimal index page that installs a service worker script with SRI (subresource integrity) to make its JavaScript code immutable, and DNSLink to ensure the immutability of this index page.

The service worker can then contact some endpoint to download & verify light-client-style proofs that
(1) The site's ENS domain name points to an Orbiter-type offchain ENS resolver.
(2) The IPCM contract for this domain resolves to some IPFS CID.

Then the service worker can then download the contents of that IPFS CID and serve the actual index page and its contents verifiably.

Super stretch goals
https://warpcast.com/polymutex.eth/0xadd4b9c3

I will be reviewing the options above in more details soon.

2. @earthfast.
Looks great! Probably the only option that pioneered the approach of using a service worker to verify CID hashes.
Cons:
- Pricing model still unclear
- Earthfast homepage doesn't load at all in my Firefox browser (the service worker violates CSP for some reason)

https://warpcast.com/sidsethi/0x61a74689