![Hvstlr ↑↑↑ pfp](https://imagedelivery.net/BXluQx4ige9GuW0Ia56BHw/e04177e2-b4e9-4de3-3efb-673e5d9faf00/original)
Hvstlr ↑↑↑
@poisonone.eth
181 Following
475 Followers
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
2 replies
4 recasts
10 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Back on that scenecoin game.
A scene requires context; transactions made legible can provide that.
A reputation/identity system based on transactions can form stickiness and capture value added via direct actions.
Call it proof of work of work, proof of belief, or proof of enjoyment. Creators want distribution, but incentives for curation are weak.
This is important because, in social contexts (a scene, perhaps), platforms have limited distribution potential. Curated platforms don't scale, and algorithmic platforms are a commodity.
Ultimately, curators provide distribution at social scale.
The platform then, is the coin itself. More specifically, it's the scene formed by the context around the token. 0 reply
1 recast
6 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction