Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
Took a 20 minute Uber today, cost me $19.89. Driver took home a little over $5. Uber's take is 75% - that seems surprisingly high. I would have expected a split closer to 50-50.
57 replies
5 recasts
162 reactions

Patrick pfp
Patrick
@pl
Chiming in as someone who worked on this at Lyft until 2022 Take rate is actually low, like 10%. That’s why Uber/Lyft aren’t profitable This is take rate over all driver expenses though. Per ride, it’s highly variable That’s because most of your fare goes towards incentives to get drivers on the app, on the road, and at the right time and place Eg. A $15 bonus to do 3 rides in the evening downtown, or a $1000 bonus for new drivers to sign up and do 100 rides, a $5 bonus for driving to an area we expect will have lots of riders soon, etc. such that when you call a ride, there’s a driver nearby Still, 25% of your fare is quite low, we had limits on this at Lyft
2 replies
4 recasts
14 reactions

Patrick pfp
Patrick
@pl
Note this ~10% number is after credit card fees, driver benefits, etc. I may be off on this but IIRC drivers in CA earn benefits like insurance/sick pay after driving >20hrs/week - this was after a certain Prop bill was passed
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

✿ Gil Alter ✿ pfp
✿ Gil Alter ✿
@gilalter.eth
So there’s more nuance than I originally thought… though it sounds to me like an inefficient system. Taking 75% just to give most of it back to drivers in round-about ways? Curious, would like to hear more!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction