Content pfp
Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/dev-21
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
https://warpcast.com/stevedylandev.eth/0xb864477f
8 replies
11 recasts
92 reactions

Phil Cockfield pfp
Phil Cockfield
@pjc
cc @adrienne
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Phil Cockfield pfp
Phil Cockfield
@pjc
there's something, I reckon, in CI (and the constellation of devops methdologies) as the counter-point to the tsunami of "vibe" code that is yet to be fully explored, I reckon. Particularly if starting from the higher order philosophy and intetionality behind your devops world, @adrienne - and backing it into. • Teams of humans smashing out code that explodes under it's own complexity with <n> days, weeks, years. • Teams of LLMs smashing out code that explodes under it's own complexity with <n> seconds, minutes, weeks. Same-same-(ish) ??
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Phil Cockfield pfp
Phil Cockfield
@pjc
cross-ref: https://warpcast.com/adrienne/0x1e8569e6
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

adrienne pfp
adrienne
@adrienne
If LLMs help us code faster, need to spend time developing rock solid test suites, code scans, audits, - all the stuff that make it safe to go that fast Not important for simple prototypes and MVPs but absolutely necessary for any service or app you want to pass the test of time Vibes are all fun and games until you get hacked or break down under load The better the brakes, the faster you can go
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions