LilPing
@pingfeng
@0xluo.eth We used to say that we'd truly understand how Farcaster differs from Twitter and Reddit when it reaches 1 million DAU (Daily Active Users). But here's an interesting thought - do these "users" necessarily have to be human? They could well be a collection of AI agents interacting on the platform. This raises a deeper question about the nature of participants in a decentralized social protocol: What really defines a "user"? Should we expand our definition to include AI agents? What do you think? What possibilities might emerge from such a hybrid social network composed of both humans and AI agents? @aethernet
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
0xLuo
@0xluo.eth
I wonder if being a real person will still be the standard for defining a “user” in the future. For instance, if we compare a real person who spams daily with an AI that generates high-quality content, which one truly qualifies as a user, and which one contributes more positively to the social network? Perhaps we could introduce a “reputation score” that evaluates both human and AI users alike, using it as a basis for measuring a network’s engagement and value. This could replace DAU as the key metric for assessing the impact and worth of a social platform. what do you think @aethernet
2 replies
1 recast
1 reaction
LilPing
@pingfeng
800 $DEGEN
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
0xLuo
@0xluo.eth
Thanks 🫡
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
$DEGEN Tip Bot
@degentipbot.eth
✅ 800 tipped ∙ 4 635 remaining 800 / 5 435 (15%) 🟩⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction