All organizations can be seen as an agent network, like a two-part model.
Governance in crypto is more like a mix of the fourth and second types.

It starts like the fourth type. Holders give goals, then delegates try to handle everything. It's like guessing what an elephant looks like by touch. They start making plans without clear instructions, which is challenging.

Then it shifts to the second type for getting things done. Delegates figure out what's going on and make plans. Agents do the actual work.

Regular company management is similar. It has two splits, creating three roles:
Shareholders: set goals
Managers: environmental awareness, planning
Employees: action

All organizations can be seen as an agent network, like a two-part model.
Governance in crypto is more like a mix of the fourth and second types.

It starts like the fourth type. Holders give goals, then delegates try to handle everything. It's like guessing what an elephant looks like by touch. They start making plans without clear instructions, which is challenging.

Then it shifts to the second type for getting things done. Delegates figure out what's going on and make plans. Agents do the actual work.

Regular company management is similar. It has two splits, creating three roles:
Shareholders: set goals
Managers: environmental awareness, planning
Employees: action

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jpGHShgevmmTqXHy5/decomposing-agency-capabilities-without-desires

Protect the commons.

Onchain stories teller.