I like running, poker and oysters | Founder, Social Forensics (SocialForensics.com) | Berkeley & UPenn | Learning to listen

users will complain about posting content on a platform that gets engagement primarily from "bots", yet will brag about how many mints their NFT got in a campaign minted primarily by "bots"

so bots are good if giving $$, but bad if giving replies??

to quote @geoffgolberg, "the cognitive dissonance is strong here" :)

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

This is why follower counts on Farcaster have always felt really vapid to me. Sure, I have 24k followers, but my engaged audience is probably closer to like 1 or 2k.

Founder of the /success channel. Search Marketing Director at Kraken Kratom. 

My circle is even smaller. I think I see the same 500 people all the time.

Pi-chi.eth (she/her) Artist /animeoutcasts
Purple Promoter|Tokyo DAO
Hosting: /moxietools /kyoto /sakura  /anime-manga /tokyotravel

https://www.fan.io/pichi

father, husband, css booster, ux engineer, silently defining variables as /sdv sdv.wtf

I have notifications on for folks I don't see in my feed enough.

I think this is universal across all social media platforms though.

An influencer with 1-2 million followers would be lucky to get 1% engagement from their followers.

I bet that most of the engagement comes from one off interactions because those platforms have much better virality and sharing mechanics built in.

1k-2k is being really generous with myself lol. Pretty much the same feeling.

But that could also just be the most engaged part of my audience. Idk.