Farcaster

why don’t people form small groups (3-5) around an interest, create a channel, and cast/reply to each other? 

it could:
1. amplify reach (shared audiences)  
2. create richer, more dynamic discussions (shared effort)
3. build deeper connections  

maybe it feels like extra work or it’s hard to find each other?

I’m the admin for a small invite-only group chat with great deep-dive discussions. (Currently 34 people; about 10 are regularly active). 

We’d love to have a public, community-owned cozy corner in addition to our private chat. Here's why we haven’t started a channel:

- We don’t have a sustainable economic model to support it. Channels are labor-intensive if done well. Even slow-paced small group discussions require regular maintenance. Without paid moderators and sustainable ways for network effects to accrue to the contributors, curators, and maintainers, it's unlikely to be feasible long-term. 

- Information impermanence. Groups develop collective memories over time, so they need easily accessible spots for archived material, rules, FAQs, best-of lists, etc. Right now even the best channel discussions get buried in the “perpetual now” of the algo feed and quickly forgotten, so there's no good place for what we'd like to do.

Writer, senior editor, music nerd, GenX eldergoth, monastery-bootstrapper. https://paragraph.xyz/@danicaswanson https://tinyurl.com/Black-Stone-Wordsmith

We don’t even have rules or norms anymore that I can point to.

Pi-chi.eth (she/her) Artist /animeoutcasts
Purple Promoter| Hosting: /moxietools /kyoto /momiji  /anime-manga /farcasterunion

https://portrait.so/pichi