Danica Swanson pfp
Danica Swanson
@danicaswanson
I’m the admin for a small invite-only group chat with great deep-dive discussions. (Currently 34 people; about 10 are regularly active). We’d love to have a public, community-owned cozy corner in addition to our private chat. Here's why we haven’t started a channel: - We don’t have a sustainable economic model to support it. Channels are labor-intensive if done well. Even slow-paced small group discussions require regular maintenance. Without paid moderators and sustainable ways for network effects to accrue to the contributors, curators, and maintainers, it's unlikely to be feasible long-term. - Information impermanence. Groups develop collective memories over time, so they need easily accessible spots for archived material, rules, FAQs, best-of lists, etc. Right now even the best channel discussions get buried in the “perpetual now” of the algo feed and quickly forgotten, so there's no good place for what we'd like to do.
2 replies
3 recasts
9 reactions

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸 pfp
Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸
@pichi
We don’t even have rules or norms anymore that I can point to.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

eirrann | he/him pfp
eirrann | he/him
@eirrann.eth
It's definitely the most thoughtful group chat I'm in I love seeing the conversations, even when I have nothing meaningful to contribute I agree that Warpcast doesn't have any functions that can properly meet these needs, be that channels or group chats
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction