Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
martin ↑
@martin
some thoughts on building a network of higher-aligned tokens
13 replies
14 recasts
121 reactions
SAINTLESS
@saintless.eth
not the burn people wanted but the "burn" people needed how is it improving liquidity for higher?
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
martin ↑
@martin
still wrapping my brain around it, BUT - if you have a new coin, let's say $FASTER, launching with $HIGHER pair, starts small like $30k in $HIGHER and $30k in $FASTER - as it grows, more $HIGHER is put in the pool, and $FASTER goes up, meaning there is more value in the pool - if someone wants to buy or sell $HIGHER there are now more pools that store value? could be wrong, i guess having an additional $FASTER/ETH pool would be valuable here
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
SAINTLESS
@saintless.eth
not sure it necessarily improves higher liq unless the route is thru all the associated tokens the trend is now one sided liquidity, nobody launching a token wants to put 30K of their own money in the LP so I wonder if a collab with clanker might be possible? <clanker launch $FASTER but pair it with $HIGHER>
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
This is a cool idea! How would it change the experience of the early buyer (if at all)? Their early trades more successful if they are using higher?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
martin ↑
@martin
Most likely would be the same - ETH gets routed to $HIGHER to their token when they buy automatically
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
It would be interesting if holding higher somehow gave you advantages (as a buyer) with these higher-aligned tokens. (Don’t know how. Just when I think about it, it makes me excited to hold higher)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Gabriel 🎩
@phoebe-heess
Small airdrop at launch depending on how much you hold?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
