Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
PhiMarHal
@phimarhal
A small UI win for Metamask would be to let you hide addresses with 0 ETH on the currently selected network. Rabby does this and goes beyond, by ordering your addresses by size, and multichain. This is actually more opinion/abstraction than I want. It results in less info ultimately - "where is my money". Forces me to delve deeper to find where's the money. I'd prefer simply hiding 0 ETH addresses per network. Less clicks.
2 replies
2 recasts
2 reactions
WebOfTrust
@weboftrust
you are still using MM ?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
PhiMarHal
@phimarhal
Yep. Rabby still lags far behind when it comes to advanced features. To this day I don't think there's even an option to add hex data at all. And even though I don't care enough about privacy to mind the large amount of personal data Rabby leaks, I'm still not super confident trusting them with hot wallets.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
WebOfTrust
@weboftrust
which extension you use with MM to simulate a transaction ?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
PhiMarHal
@phimarhal
I don't simulate txs with MM, I typically don't need to.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
PhiMarHal
@phimarhal
I think they have an integrated thirdparty simulator by default either way (but if I'm being honest, I don't look at it, because it's less reliable/readable than Rabby)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction