Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
What’s on your mind re: Farcaster? Will try to answer as many questions as I can today.
58 replies
98 recasts
619 reactions

phil pfp
phil
@phil
I think the opportunity in 2025 is to make this network the canonical place for discussion around onchain activity To do that, I think we need to improve affordances in the feed for surfacing and replying to transactions and accounts, which are the atomic unit of activity onchain
2 replies
10 recasts
115 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
I remain unconvinced canonical discussions about specific onchain events is a consumer use case vs. the meta discussion (which already happens)
2 replies
0 recast
15 reactions

frdysk.framedl.eth pfp
frdysk.framedl.eth
@frdysk
I miss @onceuponxyz's tx frame, it was so good surfacing txs, putting interactable proofs on bad actors' parent casts
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions