Content
@
https://solana.com
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
phil
@phil
The introduction of /solana support into the Warpcast ecosystem will be a huge value add. Both ETH & SOL camps have great ideas. I love Phantom, Tensor, and Jup and can do things on SOL that aren’t possible on ETH. Lots to learn from our brethren and I’m sure we can all coexist peacefully under the same roof.
9 replies
10 recasts
146 reactions
Decypher
@decypher
Considering the audience of Solana, adopting it should result in a good influx of people for this Dapp. Only my start here but I see this as a chain agnostic Dapp that should reach out as far as possible
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Coop
@coopahtroopa.eth
Couldn't agree more. Best of both worlds!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
InsideTheSim 🎩🍪
@insidethesim.eth
This is brilliant because when Solana goes down they can still coordinate here!
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Adrian DeFi
@adrian-defi
Absolutely, I am very active on ETH, L2s and SOL. Why should we fight each other? L2s with an SVM combined might become the mightiest solution ever. 🙌
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
3Cycle
@3cycle
What specific components will actually run on Solana and base in this configuration?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rooter
@rooter
solana channel is happening
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jackson 🎩🍖
@jacks0n
Think the opposite, there is no reason for this app/protocol to know about multiple chains let alone multiple chain architectures Duplicates engineering effort and confuses the protocol Accessibility from fc to solana will happen via interop at the application/contract layer though
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ethereum Daily 🗞️
@rue1776
What does Solana support mean in practice? Someone could build a new FC client that runs on Solana instead of Optimism?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
