Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/flows
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
rocketman
@rocketman
if we make a rough analogy to a company, flows is currently structured like a big inefficient company where employees and departments don't work together, they actively compete with each other. how can we restructure it so that people are working together on projects that drive revenue for the larger program?
5 replies
1 recast
17 reactions
rocketman
@rocketman
basically what i'm thinking is this: projects have an option to "create startup" which: - sets up a flow managed by project creator - optionally sets up new revnet - gives founder a basic money management view where they can start new streams to "employees", pay bounties etc. lets the project expand beyond single player mode, gives upside to creators, lets projects build invested fanbase, and if denominated in $flows tokens it strengthens entire flows economy
2 replies
0 recast
9 reactions
Pandagrey🔵🎩
@pandagrey
This isnt great, and aligns with a thought i have been having about creating an investor fund for startups on web3. The danger is you'd need a heavier size of funds per startup and results cant be as regular as a solo flow. And now sustainability and profitability becomes a huge factor limiting what can be funded. My final thought: attempt it and figure it out along the day, there are grey areas not foreseable until it is tried Or simply continue with flows, and offer scaling opportunities to projects that has shown impactful remarkable results, achieving a balance
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Pandagrey🔵🎩
@pandagrey
*This is great
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
