Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Noun 40
@noun40
discourse around DUNA seems to be focused around the downsides (added KYC requirement to grantees) imo DUNA's massive upsides are: - reducing tax risk - providing limited legal liability to members while still allowing: - members to remain anonymous (privacy) - explicit voting rights to members if there are other avenues to achieve the above without any compromises then that would be wonderful, but as far as i know at the moment DUNA is unique in offering the above properties with limited compromises (paying taxes in the US, KYC req for grantees). more thoughts continued π
7 replies
43 recasts
150 reactions
Hoot π©
@owl
A Marshal islands DAO entity could work as well. Not sure about kyc requirements cc @midao
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Leo
@leohenkels
The RMI DAO LLC provides all the above-mentioned upsides while still allowing the DAO to remain offshore + added benefits. I wonder if KYC is βNounsβ policy or if itβs required by the Wyoming DUNA.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction