Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Elad pfp
Elad
@el4d
Let's delegate or transfer several Nouns to Protocol Guild. Wdyt?
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Elad pfp
Elad
@el4d
More generally, we probably want to give "free access" to great public goods contributors.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Noun 40 pfp
Noun 40
@noun40
since we want ppl to actually vote and be engaged with nouns, I think it might be better to imagine specific people. for example, would trent or tim who engaged with us in the past be willing to accept a noun if gifted?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
why not access the collective? More voices behind each noun is ultimately preferable, no?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

oni pfp
oni
@oni
i talked with trent a bit during a previous donation, i can reach out to see if he can gauge interest from the group/reps, agree a bit with 40 though that asking the entire guild to vote as opposed to individuals would be bit of overhead in governance/coordination which some may not be interested in
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
Assuming they reach quorum on nouns votes then you get at least the same lvl of net engagement from the group as from individuals & if they want to silo or delegate to indiv members they prob could figure it out? To me the core of @el4d idea was that the nouns go to an org expressly constrained to serve the public good
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction