Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Noun 40 pfp
Noun 40
@noun40
still feel this way reflection on dao vote re: $nouns was that it was unnecessarily contentious upfront when consensus can be gradual much like how farcaster adoption was bottom up and gradual, $nouns can be community deployed and used by ppl that want to use it dao engagement (eg treasury nouns) can come later
2 replies
1 recast
39 reactions

Noun It pfp
Noun It
@nounit
I agree. The defeat of Proposal 536 stemmed from a misunderstanding. It was perceived as a strategic vote, imagined as a conflict between the tokenized NounsDAO and the NFT community's NounsDAO strategies. Opponents rejected this route due to concerns about regulatory issues and an incomplete token model.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Noun It pfp
Noun It
@nounit
However, this vote wasn't about strategy. It was simply a request for Nouns product audit fees. A small feature, where the token is the product, could be more competitive on Farcaster. Some community members need this use case, similar to $degen use cases on Farcaster.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction