Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
two things can be true: 1. this is good revenue generation for these pods that wouldn’t have been generated on traditional platforms 2. as a podcaster, “minutes listened” is infinitely more valuable to me compared to “mints,” which imo is the most unreliable onchain metric for quality of multimedia content
21 replies
13 recasts
126 reactions
YES2Crypto 🎩 🟪🟡
@yes2crypto.eth
True enough, I mint probably 5x more podcasts than I actually listen to. I see a mint? I mint it. Low investment; FC makes it way easier. I see a podcast? takes a lot more for me to invest my time. FC makes podcasts hard since I can't listen in background. I have to go to YT, downcast or something else.
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
so let’s assume only 20% of pod minters actually listen to the pod that means you actually need 5x distribution compared to web2 pods for brand deals and sponsorships to be worthwhile to the brand livestream attendance is a more accurate representation of distribution for multimedia content s/o @gmfarcaster
4 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
Lucas 🔥_🔥
@0xl
Caveat is that your monetizing on 100% of mints and that could mean you don’t need to rely on brand deals and their distribution/audience requirements to earn a living That said if you’re succeeding on getting mints - you’re building a list of wallet addresses (read: public Venmo accounts) of people that engaged with you that you can then therefore sell to brands. Seeing this work today with @rehash @levy and others
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
Not sustainable on mints alone at this point. Absolutely need brand deals/sponsor for sustainability. But agree with the point regarding boosting appeal to web3 brands with the mints.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
