Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
something i’ve observed anecdotally and loosely validated qualitatively is that someone’s reply:quotecast ratio when contributing to a conversation correlates to their ego (how they see themselves vs the rest of the community). not always a bad thing, but i’ll leave it at that. study people who reply > quotecast
29 replies
11 recasts
140 reactions
Noun 839
@noun839.eth
I'm not a big quotecaster but when I do, often it is because I think that it will give the person more reach then a straight recast. I have no idea if this is true.
5 replies
1 recast
42 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
yes, as mentioned quote casting is not always a bad thing because i’ve seen casters with large followings use it to drive awareness to an interesting conversation by smaller accounts or amplify a smaller account (which is net positive and self aware of them to use their distribution in such a way)
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Jacque(she|her).⌐◨-◨
@jacque
It does help highlight smaller accounts and I find is appreciated on that level to add to another group and get visibility.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
FlexasaurusRex◨-◨Ⓜ️🎩
@flexasaurusrex
it doesn't seem like it makes that big of a difference except that you can attach opinion to it which could sway more viewership.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
wake
@wake.eth
that's how I use it. a new discussion tree with higher viz.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
pentacle
@pentacle
i both reply and quote cast what does that mean?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
