Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
If Warpcast were to build 1-2 features for channels that would improve the UX for you, what would they be? Specifically interested in activating more Nouns people on Farcaster and in this channel.
8 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
Noun 40
@noun40
i’ve had the desire to comment on onchain actions like vote reasons for a while now. is it possible to have like a canonical farcaster object that every client (including gov clients) could use to build an aggregated commenting system so that we could all have fun reacting to the same thing?
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Noun 40
@noun40
replying to a cast of a bot doesn’t feel quite the same. basically can farcaster be the credibly neutral commenting layer for everything happening onchain that can be shared by clients of all types.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
martin ↑
@martin
+1 on the shared clients and aggregated commenting. I think there’s an opportunity for Farcaster to be the on chain communication channel for most Nouns things. ie would be great to have something for propdates.wtf to “plug into”
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Gabriel Ayuso
@gabrielayuso.eth
Casts can be parented to any URI so if there is a canonical URI for a proposal, a vote, an auction, etc. the protocol will support being the comment system for it. However, Warpcast most likely won't support it and will need a separate client that can handle that. https://warpcast.com/gabrielayuso.eth/0xb48621
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
