Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

₿Ξnbodhi ✦⁺ ↗ 🎩ᖽ pfp
₿Ξnbodhi ✦⁺ ↗ 🎩ᖽ
@benbodhi
+1 vote reasons are increasingly feeling less nounish to me. No shade on those using them. Just feels a little cliquey. Somewhat of a ganging up vibe. “This person has said THE reason”. Which in some cases probably makes sense. Just a vibe I get when reading, thought I’d share. I’ve prob done it myself too 😅
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

seneca pfp
seneca
@seneca
referring to my vote on nftr and follow on vwrs? if so, i agree it doesn't look great. otoh, i do it all the time because it makes it easy to vote without having to rewrite a reason.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

₿Ξnbodhi ✦⁺ ↗ 🎩ᖽ pfp
₿Ξnbodhi ✦⁺ ↗ 🎩ᖽ
@benbodhi
None specific, but I’ve noticed it a few times and seems to be getting more prevalent. Totally understand doing it if in agreement with someone else’s reason and saving time for sure. But I can’t help but notice the way it might make people/proposers feel.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Noun 40 pfp
Noun 40
@noun40
question to ask tho is would you prefer a no reason vote over a +1 vote?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

₿Ξnbodhi ✦⁺ ↗ 🎩ᖽ pfp
₿Ξnbodhi ✦⁺ ↗ 🎩ᖽ
@benbodhi
Yeah from that perspective, a +1 is obv better than nothing. Honestly just sharing a vibe though, no expectations. Because for a “build in the open” ecosystem, there’s an element of closed and private which seems to be reinforced or make it more evident with votes like that.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction