a personal attack from an anon account is attacking someone who can't strike back

extremely uncourageous and lame

in the same category as hitting someone who's defenseless

I'm very supportive of all the anon projects in general but to be interesting they need credibility (otherwise it's just 4chan on Farcaster which isn't going to be interesting to most people) and to credibility they can't be used for cowardly purposes

if you are using anonymity to critique you should be more gracious not less given you've opted to take your skin out of the game

Building @warpcast and @farcaster, new dad, like making food

I don’t get this gate keeping behavior. 

If there’s truth to the critique, why does it matter if it’s an anon or known person…

I’m not privy to the drama behind this whole convo, but ‘bravery in criticizing’ seems like dismissing the feedback, just because someone doesn’t want to become the center of potential retaliation. 

What’s the drama about?

Took a break. Now gearing up for the next round. Still checking out everything onchain. 

https://portrait.so/notfloris

Ok, I’ve done some catching up. 

I’ve noticed that some people become really verbally abusive, racial, aggressive once they’re anon. That’s not cool, and should just not get attention. 

For real fair feedback, it shouldn’t matter if the giver is anon. If there’s substance to the content of the message. 

But just puking violent abusive garbage should somehow be ‘ignored by consensus’.

the point is practical people will tune out